Several years ago, there was a time when I lost my Internet connection. Although I had a lot of work to do, I couldn’t think of anything I could accomplish without Internet access. It was about quarter to twelve, so I took an early lunch.
An hour later it still wasn’t working, so I made the dreaded call to my provider. I greatly dislike doing so because they have an attitude that the problem is my fault. It’s the technological world’s version of “guilty until proven innocence.” After enduring numerous automated prompts and punching in an inordinate number of digits, they preformed an automatic test of my line. They pronounced it good and—coincidently or not—my Internet connection started working shortly thereafter. It was a time to give serious thought to how I would conduct business if I were to lose Internet conductivity for a prolonged period of time. Click To Tweet
That prompted a renewed reminder of just how much I depend on the Internet to work. It was time to give serious thought to how I would conduct business if I were to lose Internet access for a prolonged period of time.
Although it was easy to quickly dismiss such a worry as highly unlikely, I once read a report that a bill pending in the US Senate would give President Obama, the power to turn off computer networks in the interest of national security. Yep, that’s right. An Internet off switch in the White House.
The feeling was that in the event of a cyber attack, no Internet would be preferred to a crippled Internet. I presumed that the course of action would be to shut the whole thing down, stop or counter the threat, and then bring it back up in a controlled and orderly manner.
That all made sense and seemed like a good course of action—until it actually happens and we can’t work.
Do you like this post? Want to read more? Check out Peter’s book, Woodpecker Wars: Discovering the Spirituality of Every Day Life, available wherever books are sold.